As RFK Jr. defends cuts to public health, experts warn of devastating effects that could haunt Americans for decades

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "As RFK Jr. defends cuts to public health, experts warn of devastating effects that could haunt Americans for decades" has 1880 words across 5 sentences, which will take approximately 8 - 16 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "As RFK Jr. defends cuts to public health, experts warn of devastating effects that could haunt Americans for decades" was covered 1 weeks ago by Fortune, a news publisher based in United States.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Fortune' news outlet?

Fortune is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1929 that covers mostly economy and business news. The outlet is headquartered in United States and publishes an average of 31 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 8 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #27836281</li><li>URL: https://citrocola.beamstart.com/news/as-rfk-jr-defends-cuts-17445462648688</li></ul>

Fortune Logo Fortune 1w ago

As RFK Jr. defends cuts to public health, experts warn of devastating effects that could haunt Americans for decades - Fortune

Quick Summary:

There is one area to which experts say Trump’s administration unquestionably has already done real damage: public health.

That project required administrative approval from the National Institutes of Health to continue its final two years, at a cost of about $2 million per year, Bieniasz says.

But the termination had nothing to do with that; rather, Fodera says the note she received from the NIH said the reason was “unsafe antisemitic actions that suggest the institution lacks concern for the safety and well-being of Jewish students.“The true emergency, as I see it, is the politically-driven attacks on science as a way to suppress free speech,” Fodera tells Fortune.“Science itself should be an apolitical, objective pursuit that benefits all of humanity, regardless of one’s race, sex, nationality, religion or political party affiliation.